Hancock ceded her right to three groups, the Congress of California Seniors, the California Faculty Association and the Consumer Federation of California. Their argument, backed by Hancock, emphasizes that the bill was “hastily drafted behind closed doors” and that a spending limit would hurt state services, but it does not mention any of the tax extensions.

Read More ›

The budget fiasco has provoked a healthy discussion of the need for governance reform. The starting point for reform should be asserting the democratic principle of majority rule. California must eliminate super-majority requirements that facilitate budget tyranny by a small cabal of extremist lawmakers.

Read More ›

Perhaps the worst part about this new contract is the fact that it was proposed under the radar, without the public being made aware of it, so citizens don’t even have the chance to ask all of the questions they want regarding their privacy and security. Read More ›

The ACLU is fighting the proposal with a handful of other groups, including…the Consumer Federation of California, which says the plan poses “massive threats” to personal privacy. “We see this as sort of creeping Big Brother government, an invasion of people’s privacy,” said Richard Holober, executive director of the…Consumer Federation of California.
Read More ›

The problem is that the DMV’s plan has not been vetted by anyone and no analysis has been made of the potential security and privacy implications, said Richard Holober, executive director of the Consumer Federation of California. Read More ›

…the DMV contract proposal would give government snoops new weapons to identify and record your presence at a protest rally or picket line. California lawmakers should stand up against the further expansion of government data collection technology that can be used to invade our privacy without first setting ironclad rules that limit its use to essential and lawful purposes.
Read More ›